Built to pass the review your IT team is paid to run.
Your credentials stay with you. HIPAA-aligned architecture with PHI isolated in a dedicated plane, BAAs signed, 21 CFR Part 11 signatures, and SMART on FHIR integration measured in weeks.
row-level audit
PHI lives in an isolated data plane, separate from identity and billing.
Access is audited row by row. De-identified projections feed everything else.
phi plane
de-identified projection
Identity, orgs, billing
PHI plane: patient and clinical data, isolated
row-level audit
HIPAA + BAA
21 CFR Part 11 e-signatures
Complete audit trails
Subprocessor transparency
/subprocessors →SMART on FHIR launch from your EHR.
A typical integration is measured in weeks. Standalone capture works day one while IT review proceeds.
SSO/SAML, role-based access, org-scoped everything.
Your data capture system already has an adverse events form. This is not that.
Every electronic data capture system has fields for an adverse event: the term, the grade, the attribution, the dates. Those fields are where the answer is stored once somebody has worked it out.
Working it out is the part that takes the time. Someone reads the note, decides an event occurred, chooses the grade against the version that protocol names, decides which drug is implicated, and later defends all three to a monitor.
Burna produces those values and the evidence behind them, then hands them to the system you already run. If you are comparing us to your capture system, the question to ask your research team is who fills those fields in today, and how long it takes them.
The steps that produce those values, and who performs each one